Starseeds II

As suggested in the first Starseeds Q &A, the subject is, in essence, an ET one, but in a “walk among us” sense, and without necessarily any conscious awareness of those incarnated as humans, the ones doing the walking, that this is the case. The subject was probably first highlighted on any scale by Dolores Cannon, who observed it with certain hypnosis subjects during the 1960s, but it received its most involved coverage, if you want to call it that, with the Law of One channellings two decades later. Some of the following is repeated material – it can be

White Hats IX

A brief update here, replete with the usual EBS-related inquiries. There’s also a return to the agenda of Christopher Nolan’s forthcoming film Oppenheimer and a couple of questions on where the situation stands with regard to fallout from the jab (the latter subject has previously been looked at in The Vaccine Q & A). For the background to the Q & A, see the index page.     Q. Was there a delay to the global corruption announcement EBS in April?   Yes.  The EBS (Emergency Broadcast System) was planned for the last few days of the month (it had not

The Celebrity Register 5

In among this batch of those currently still circulating in Hollywood, in one form or another, are a number of influencers of a more literary bent. As one of those in particular suggests, Black Hat status may not necessarily be something an individual has embraced wholeheartedly, just as those who have crossed the room from Black to White Hat may have done so for practical reasons, rather than through seeing the light. Obviously, as a few that have been covered suggest, an individual may nurse neither affiliation, while a White Hat may be a White Hat because they’re acting against

White Hats 8

Another scintillating chapter of White Hat inquiry. Some of the following includes mention of individuals who might loosely fall into a Celebrity Register post (and one might conversely suggest some of those showing up there might better be included here), but in the loosest terms, the world of entertainment goes in the Celebrity Register and more expressly directed matters, be they White Hat or Black Hat, go here. One area that becomes evident with the Q & As is that terms can be relative. One can be a White Hat and not necessarily counted as a particularly upstanding person. One

White Hats 4most

There’s nothing quite so perplexing as trying to get the measure of White Hats happenings, bebopping and scatting all over as they seem prone to do. I’ve probably got a better grip on the mechanics of time travel, and that’s saying something! The answers received in Q & As regarding White Hat activities have appeared consistent, give or take the pesky incapacity to set a “reveal” date and stick to it, but I’m nevertheless prone to wonder when it’s suggested I listen to an SGAnon podcast (more so than Phil G), conceiving of/predicting as he is a range of countermeasures

White Hats II

It’s been almost a month since I posted the first White Hats Q & A, and obviously, the imminent announcement has not yet happened. Not yet. But guess what…? Nothing very lengthy here, then, but there are a few interesting nuggets, including one you’d have to be stark staring to believe. But hey, why not? A question is also included that doesn’t specifically carry current currency, but it goes to illustrate that quantifying a White Hat isn’t necessarily so much about looking into the heart; it may, in some circumstances, more accurately be an “enemy of my enemy” qualification. For the

White Hat Operations

As noted in the introduction to the Politicians & Royals Q &A, it would seem an announcement is imminent – in the absence of unforeseen eventualities – so this seems like a good moment to assemble information. As indicated in the introduction to that post, the “current events” side hasn’t been a primary focus, in part because, on the understanding that the matter is in hand, the minutiae of present, ever-changing events – the rehearsed politics, the hows and whens of revelations – are less illuminating than their background and the greater universal – if you like – picture. For the

The Vaccine

The following summarises questions and answers concerning the vaccination programme, mostly asked over the course of 2021. Prescriptive to the following is acknowledging the baseline that there is no virus and that the vaccination programme is nefarious in nature. The second vaccination is also required for the full intended negative effects to be realised. For the background to the Q & A, see the index page.     2022     Q. Are provisions in place for treatment of the vaccinated?   Yes.     Q. When were bad vaccines discontinued? When did this process begin?   The switch over to vaccines