White Hats XVI

This post is less a Q & A – although, I’ll be referring to previous answers – than a consideration of a couple of recent livecasts in the Truther field, one in respect of intel and the other, the fallout from running with the views of a patented dissenting voice. With regard to the latter, Clif High’s position on NESARA/GESARA and QFS, the validity of which he has regularly dismissed on X, is nothing new. The only difference this time is that, ardent disciple of the controversy monger that he is, Jean-Claude of Beyond Mystic has devoted an inflammatory passage

Dark Forces VI

The degree to which Dark Forces are still a “thing” would appear to be debatable at this point. I don’t just mean in terms of White Hats prevailing over them, which is generally assumed to come down to when and how – rather than if – the fact of this comes into the public domain. And not really even the prospect that they’ve been packed off somewhere, never to darken Earth’s doors again – or bare minimum, not for at least a millennium.  Rather, if indeed the entire universe is ascending and, consequently, nothing that’s “unascended” (or to put it

Starseeds III: Ascension

Or should that be: Appraising Ascension Dissension? I’ve been taking in Honey C Golden’s videos recently – extremely late to the party there, I know – and the area that’s perhaps most interesting, not least because it’s the focus of her message, is that of ascension. In the context of Q & As, that’s because it does, in part, suggest apparent divergence and contrast with previous answers. Obviously, the easiest interpretation is that one is right and one is wrong, but as with many things pertaining to the non-transparently 3D, the truth may be opaquer, reflecting both perspective and, in

Antimatter V

There’s regular cause to reframe or backtrack with this Q & A process. Invariably because an assumption has been made, and it isn’t until much later that it’s realised there’s a qualifier in there, or that one’s understanding of the thing one thought one understood wasn’t that at all. So there’s some of that in this Antimatter, mostly deriving from understanding – or misunderstanding – of AMT (Ascended Machine Technology). There’s also a related element, that of appearances in the antimatter universe. Misconceptions of AMT sparked heading off down the wrong course there, but a particular answer in Antimatter III

Antimatter IV

Another brief post, with inquiries into the antimatter universe attempting to dig further into its appearance as it relates to/contrasts with our own. So far, that isn’t proving especially fruitful, as one needs to conceive the appropriate language in the question to yield a clear response. There’s also some background on AMT, such as there is available.     Q. Is AMT both artificial and natural?   Yes. Answers previously confirmed AMT as artificial beings with a soul (in March last year), but in February elicited the confirmation that AMT is natural; on the face of it, these are contradictory

Antimatter III

A fairly brief immersion into antimatter this time, one that – as ever – raises a degree of confusion, both in terms of defining terms (see the first answer and how it relates, or perhaps does not relate, to previous ones on this subject) and basic visualisation of a realm that is foreign to us and yet which, per the Seth Material – and also confirmed by answers relating to his wisdom – is one we “live in” as much as we do our familiar matter universe.  Additionally, there’s further consideration of the antimatter AI, eliciting answers that are, perhaps,

Dark Forces IV

This latest delve into all things Dark Forces is more disposed towards the discarnate realm, focussing predominately on the subject of archons. While a fair few questions are answered, the subject has nevertheless barely been broached here. But there’s always next time. For now, at least, there is hopefully some perspective given both on prevailing archon lore and how the actuality would appear to diverge from it (prevailing archon lore is, however, quite wide-ranging in its bases). The remainder of the questions include angels and demons. The former, because they have been mooted in some quarters of late as a

White Hats XIII

All things Truther seem to have been in a noticeable state of unrest over the past few months. Some of that may be down to the increasingly tenuous – to anyone expecting actual, tangible, and ideally sudden, defining confirmation of everything they have invested themselves in – assurance that White Hats are about to reveal their victory over Dark Forces any time now. You know, just as soon as they’ve sorted out the stragglers. Some of it seems to be the broad church that is Truther movement perversely intent on devouring itself, ouroboros-like, over its own internal differences in opinion,

Beyond the Ice Wall Part V

Any attempts to distil the realm beyond the Ice Wall is going to be hit and miss, short of a filmed travelogue starring Michael Palin, and Q & As so far have inevitably fallen prey to assumptions based on the morsels of verification yielded by “Yes” and “No” responses. I encountered the William Morris (father) and Helen Morris (daughter) accounts of their experiences in the lands beyond a couple of years back but admittedly didn’t pay them sufficient credit, in part because they’re quite elaborate (Helen’s especially, in terms of the range of places, peoples and events) but mostly because

White Hats XII

Any day now… Any day now… There are no prospective dates or ballpark figures in this update. Rather, a few questions and answers relating to a smattering of figures in the Truther Movement, or to ideas they’ve proposed that have inspired further enquiry in pursuit of clarity. And, for good measure, there are also a few questions relating to the ultimate White Hat (if you want to call him that): Jesus. It’s fairly evident that nothing is proceeding with the kind of alacrity certain prognosticators would like, such that you can see Phil Godlewski’s recurring frustration – ameliorated by occasional