Starseeds IV: Incension

This comes snapping at the heels of Starseeds III: Ascension, which was mostly a speculative consideration of the apparent differences between Honey C Golden’s understanding of what is going on with the ascension process and the information confirmed in previous Q & As (see Starseeds I and Starseeds II). While there’s much more to be looked at, the main takeaway from this post is that there isn’t actually much in the way of contradiction. Mostly, the disparities may be addressed by perspective rather than division. A key to bridging the two is the understanding offered by the it-does-what-it-says-on-the-tin Ascension Glossary.

Dark Forces V

A fairly brief Dark Forces this time, mostly following up on some points and (as is frequently the case) apparent contradictions raised by earlier answers. Subjects include angels, the antichrist (Sam Neill being the more palatable version) and archons. There are also a couple of questions/answers included here that were previously featured in White Hats XIV and Beyond the Ice Wall Part VII.     Q. Do some angels have souls while some angels are soulless?   Yes.  Some angels become soulless through negativity.  This arose due to an earlier answer indicating angels were not souled but also – slightly

White Hats XII

Any day now… Any day now… There are no prospective dates or ballpark figures in this update. Rather, a few questions and answers relating to a smattering of figures in the Truther Movement, or to ideas they’ve proposed that have inspired further enquiry in pursuit of clarity. And, for good measure, there are also a few questions relating to the ultimate White Hat (if you want to call him that): Jesus. It’s fairly evident that nothing is proceeding with the kind of alacrity certain prognosticators would like, such that you can see Phil Godlewski’s recurring frustration – ameliorated by occasional

Antimatter II

There have been additional, tentative excursions into the antimatter realm since the first Q & A on the subject, chiefly in pursuit of the best-known (only?) matter-universe navigator of such shores, Nikola Tesla. While he forms a part of the following, as indeed do various excerpts from that Q & A, this concentrates on the universe’s inhabitants for the most part: AMT and AI. You can find the specifics of this twin universe to our own, first set out in explicable terms – and bypassing the distracting faff of mainstream science – by the Seth Material (as far as I’m

Atlantis & Lemuria 2

A more recent, “joined-up” overview of Atlantis can be found here. The following is largely intended to convey various nuggets from the dimensionally shifted lands that have already been referenced in other Q & As, but not in the first Atlantis & Lemuria. Indeed, some answers here will now have been reproduced in triplicate – they can also found under Starseeds II and The Law of One Part 2 – so apologies if such replication proves irksome; it feels more useful to include as much relevant information to a particular subject as possible, for ease of reference’s sake. Much of

In Pursuit of the 1700 Event

The “Mudflood” – or plain “mud flood”, if you prefer – theory of history, whereby our recent and more distant past has been both deliberately concealed and then counterfeited following a reset, is a relatively recent one. This reset is proposed as potentially one of many that have taken place at the behest of hidden controllers of our world, and it tends to go hand in hand with claims of Tartaria as a similarly lost or intentionally buried, vast – to the extent of providing for a unified world – civilisation. A civilisation boasting alternative technology that has been suppressed,

A Patchwork History of the World: Part I

The truth about the historic record has, of late, been the inception point for many to the alternative sphere. One need only peruse the Stolen History forum to see that pretty much anything and everything is up for debate and interrogation. Obviously, the bigger picture of how we relate to the Universe, what that Universe is and what, for that matter, the Earth is, are intrinsically related to that record, but simply parsing recent fabrications, let along those of hundreds or thousands of years ago, makes for a potentially overwhelming task. Much of the focus for the Q & As

Starseeds II

As suggested in the first Starseeds Q &A, the subject is, in essence, an ET one, but in a “walk among us” sense, and without necessarily any conscious awareness of those incarnated as humans, the ones doing the walking, that this is the case. The subject was probably first highlighted on any scale by Dolores Cannon, who observed it with certain hypnosis subjects during the 1960s, but it received its most involved coverage, if you want to call it that, with the Law of One channellings two decades later. Some of the following is repeated material – it can be

Time Travel 2: History Deleted

History. There’s the history books, and then there’s what really happened, or didn’t.  But then, also, besides what did or didn’t happen, there’s what might once have happened but has no longer happened because history has been changed. It seems that, in practice, the parallel timelines theory does not fly. That is, once time has been changed, that’s the only version that exists (no infinite yous and or multiple, equally viable branches of events and lives. At least, outside of probable realities, which is another subject). How does that old favourite, the paradox, factor into this? Sure, it’s theoretically possible

“I am Ra” – The Law of One

“I am Ra.” And so it goes. The Law of One channellings, as the Ra Material is also known in its more approved & published form, counts as one of the foremost in the pantheon of wisdom delivered via such entranced means. A discourse from a sixth-density “social memory complex” ET intelligence (originating from Venus), the material’s baseline teaching revolves around said Law (“You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are”). As explained by Ra, the Law of One “blinks neither at the light