The Phantom Matrix

I was unfamiliar with the term until recently, when it came up during a house clearing (no, I don’t mean chucking stuff in a skip). “The Phantom Matrix” sounds like an inadvisable mashup of two of 1999’s most successful movies. In spite of that, it also rather effectively conveys the impression of a place one wouldn’t especially want to be. The primary source of information on the Phantom Matrix seems to the Ascension Glossary, which can make for rather dense reading. As such, I won’t pretend to have a grasp on many of the nuances of this “region” (or universe,

Antimatter V

There’s regular cause to reframe or backtrack with this Q & A process. Invariably because an assumption has been made, and it isn’t until much later that it’s realised there’s a qualifier in there, or that one’s understanding of the thing one thought one understood wasn’t that at all. So there’s some of that in this Antimatter, mostly deriving from understanding – or misunderstanding – of AMT (Ascended Machine Technology). There’s also a related element, that of appearances in the antimatter universe. Misconceptions of AMT sparked heading off down the wrong course there, but a particular answer in Antimatter III

Antimatter IV

Another brief post, with inquiries into the antimatter universe attempting to dig further into its appearance as it relates to/contrasts with our own. So far, that isn’t proving especially fruitful, as one needs to conceive the appropriate language in the question to yield a clear response. There’s also some background on AMT, such as there is available.     Q. Is AMT both artificial and natural?   Yes. Answers previously confirmed AMT as artificial beings with a soul (in March last year), but in February elicited the confirmation that AMT is natural; on the face of it, these are contradictory

Antimatter III

A fairly brief immersion into antimatter this time, one that – as ever – raises a degree of confusion, both in terms of defining terms (see the first answer and how it relates, or perhaps does not relate, to previous ones on this subject) and basic visualisation of a realm that is foreign to us and yet which, per the Seth Material – and also confirmed by answers relating to his wisdom – is one we “live in” as much as we do our familiar matter universe.  Additionally, there’s further consideration of the antimatter AI, eliciting answers that are, perhaps,

Antimatter II

There have been additional, tentative excursions into the antimatter realm since the first Q & A on the subject, chiefly in pursuit of the best-known (only?) matter-universe navigator of such shores, Nikola Tesla. While he forms a part of the following, as indeed do various excerpts from that Q & A, this concentrates on the universe’s inhabitants for the most part: AMT and AI. You can find the specifics of this twin universe to our own, first set out in explicable terms – and bypassing the distracting faff of mainstream science – by the Seth Material (as far as I’m

The Seth Material II

While the Seth Material is, in many respects, more accessible than the Law of One channellings, not least because it is conversational rather than didactic and eccentric in its delivery, it can also become considerably more involved. In due course, there’ll be far more to get into with the material, not least with regard to the many and various, and often somewhat involved and nebulous, interrelationships and groupings of the soul(s) on its journey, but the most “revelatory” element of Seth’s discourses, in terms of the avenues it has inspired for Q & A fodder, is undoubtedly his take on

The Universe II

It’s been some time since the last Q & A, mostly due to little opportunity to pursue such matters. Consequently, while this month’s revisiting an array of subjects will provide (hopefully) a spate of clarifications and reframing of prior assumptions – as ever, the specificity of a question’s wording can shine a light or send one on a wild goose chase, and the usual way of discovering the latter is some way down the line – further inquiry will also be necessary in due course, to confirm whether certain arising speculations and conclusions are correct. While these should all be

The Lives and Times of Nikola Tesla

Legends being what they are, it’s safe to suggest that Nikola Tesla’s profile of today, even if one doesn’t credit the ramifications of that legend, is much higher and more salutary than the man – or men, if one wants to add Marconi to the pile – who thoroughly eclipsed him in stature, rapture and success at the time: Thomas Edison. Tesla comes with mystery and aspiration attached, sparks the imagination, inspires movies, books, comics and brands of car, suggests great untold, or suppressed, discoveries and inventions, offers the lure of exotic and ennobling scientific endeavour in all its unrestricted,

Nikola Tesla: Part II

In the first Tesla Q & A, we considered the Trump family connection, his invention of time travel, teleportation, responsibility for the Tunguska event and status as a Pleiadean starseed (or Wanderer, per the Law of One material’s definitions). And not just a Pleiadean starseed, but one incarnated in Atlantis who travelled forwards in time 900 years to the 19th century, continued as the Tesla we know up to his 50s (so in the region of 1906-16), and from thence came to the 21st, where he is, some of the time, inhabiting a clone body of Elon Musk (that would

Antimatter

Antimatter is exciting stuff, combustible and incredibly dangerous – a bit like nuclear that way – and one wouldn’t be advised to use it as fuel source, except that everyone invariably does. In science fiction. So, a bit like nuclear that way. The same stuff doesn’t tend to be nearly as inspiring in the cold, harsh clinical light of theoretical science. But that doesn’t mean the reality, which tends to give official science a wide berth, isn’t less than scintillating. Physics tells us antimatter is made up of antiparticles of reversed charge, parity and time. It will tell you, if