Antimatter IV

Another brief post, with inquiries into the antimatter universe attempting to dig further into its appearance as it relates to/contrasts with our own. So far, that isn’t proving especially fruitful, as one needs to conceive the appropriate language in the question to yield a clear response. There’s also some background on AMT, such as there is available.     Q. Is AMT both artificial and natural?   Yes. Answers previously confirmed AMT as artificial beings with a soul (in March last year), but in February elicited the confirmation that AMT is natural; on the face of it, these are contradictory

Antimatter III

A fairly brief immersion into antimatter this time, one that – as ever – raises a degree of confusion, both in terms of defining terms (see the first answer and how it relates, or perhaps does not relate, to previous ones on this subject) and basic visualisation of a realm that is foreign to us and yet which, per the Seth Material – and also confirmed by answers relating to his wisdom – is one we “live in” as much as we do our familiar matter universe.  Additionally, there’s further consideration of the antimatter AI, eliciting answers that are, perhaps,

Antimatter II

There have been additional, tentative excursions into the antimatter realm since the first Q & A on the subject, chiefly in pursuit of the best-known (only?) matter-universe navigator of such shores, Nikola Tesla. While he forms a part of the following, as indeed do various excerpts from that Q & A, this concentrates on the universe’s inhabitants for the most part: AMT and AI. You can find the specifics of this twin universe to our own, first set out in explicable terms – and bypassing the distracting faff of mainstream science – by the Seth Material (as far as I’m

The Seth Material II

While the Seth Material is, in many respects, more accessible than the Law of One channellings, not least because it is conversational rather than didactic and eccentric in its delivery, it can also become considerably more involved. In due course, there’ll be far more to get into with the material, not least with regard to the many and various, and often somewhat involved and nebulous, interrelationships and groupings of the soul(s) on its journey, but the most “revelatory” element of Seth’s discourses, in terms of the avenues it has inspired for Q & A fodder, is undoubtedly his take on

The Universe II

It’s been some time since the last Q & A, mostly due to little opportunity to pursue such matters. Consequently, while this month’s revisiting an array of subjects will provide (hopefully) a spate of clarifications and reframing of prior assumptions – as ever, the specificity of a question’s wording can shine a light or send one on a wild goose chase, and the usual way of discovering the latter is some way down the line – further inquiry will also be necessary in due course, to confirm whether certain arising speculations and conclusions are correct. While these should all be

The Lives and Times of Nikola Tesla

Legends being what they are, it’s safe to suggest that Nikola Tesla’s profile of today, even if one doesn’t credit the ramifications of that legend, is much higher and more salutary than the man – or men, if one wants to add Marconi to the pile – who thoroughly eclipsed him in stature, rapture and success at the time: Thomas Edison. Tesla comes with mystery and aspiration attached, sparks the imagination, inspires movies, books, comics and brands of car, suggests great untold, or suppressed, discoveries and inventions, offers the lure of exotic and ennobling scientific endeavour in all its unrestricted,

Nikola Tesla: Part II

In the first Tesla Q & A, we considered the Trump family connection, his invention of time travel, teleportation, responsibility for the Tunguska event and status as a Pleiadean starseed (or Wanderer, per the Law of One material’s definitions). And not just a Pleiadean starseed, but one incarnated in Atlantis who travelled forwards in time 900 years to the 19th century, continued as the Tesla we know up to his 50s (so in the region of 1906-16), and from thence came to the 21st, where he is, some of the time, inhabiting a clone body of Elon Musk (that would

Antimatter

Antimatter is exciting stuff, combustible and incredibly dangerous – a bit like nuclear that way – and one wouldn’t be advised to use it as fuel source, except that everyone invariably does. In science fiction. So, a bit like nuclear that way. The same stuff doesn’t tend to be nearly as inspiring in the cold, harsh clinical light of theoretical science. But that doesn’t mean the reality, which tends to give official science a wide berth, isn’t less than scintillating. Physics tells us antimatter is made up of antiparticles of reversed charge, parity and time. It will tell you, if

The Celebrity Register 5

In among this batch of those currently still circulating in Hollywood, in one form or another, are a number of influencers of a more literary bent. As one of those in particular suggests, Black Hat status may not necessarily be something an individual has embraced wholeheartedly, just as those who have crossed the room from Black to White Hat may have done so for practical reasons, rather than through seeing the light. Obviously, as a few that have been covered suggest, an individual may nurse neither affiliation, while a White Hat may be a White Hat because they’re acting against

Time Travel 2: History Deleted

History. There’s the history books, and then there’s what really happened, or didn’t.  But then, also, besides what did or didn’t happen, there’s what might once have happened but has no longer happened because history has been changed. It seems that, in practice, the parallel timelines theory does not fly. That is, once time has been changed, that’s the only version that exists (no infinite yous and or multiple, equally viable branches of events and lives. At least, outside of probable realities, which is another subject). How does that old favourite, the paradox, factor into this? Sure, it’s theoretically possible