One of the central tenets of “stolen history” is that we have been deceived in some very fundamental and pervasive ways about our past, even our recent past. Various theories have been forwarded in this regard, most strikingly the often jointly forwarded possibilities of a once-legendary Tartarian Empire and a “mudflood”. The latter, it is suggested, may have taken place as recently as several hundred years ago.
The mudflood concept’s genesis derives, at least in part, from buildings across the world that appear to have been constructed with lower levels buried beneath layers of earth. The resulting question, quite reasonably, being how and/or why this came to be. Obviously, there are “rational” explanations for such a design feature that bypass any need for a disaster of “global” proportions.
Another proposal, fitting with suppositions of disaster and repopulation, is that the Americas had been very conspicuously “urbanised” prior to immigrants’ arrival. Intrinsically tied to this is the “reset” buzzword that has become so “fashionable” of late, in no small part thanks to the valiant efforts of Klaus Schwab and his perfidious World Economic Forum. So what, if any, substance is there to these theories?
For the background to the Q & A, see the index page.
Q. Has there been a population reset in the past 1,000 years?
No.
Q. Has there been a population reduction in the past 1,000 years?
Yes.
Q. By how much?
75 percent.
Q. When did this occur?
Between 1720 and 1730.
Curiously, several TV shows/movies have referenced this period recently. Predator movie Prey features an alien hunter arriving on Earth in 1719, while Night Sky gives us guardians of portals to another world, ours being a “fallen” one. These families have been fulfilling their appointed task generationally for about 300 years (with 1723 specifically mentioned).
Q. What was the Earth’s population prior to the 75 percent reduction at the time of the 1700 event?
It was approximately 250m after the event (so 1bn prior to the event).
Q. Is the suggestion that the official Pompeii eruption of 79 BC actually took place in AD 1631 tied to this event?
Yes.
Q. Is Michelle Gibson’s theory that the timeline was hijacked by a dark force around 1717 correct?
Yes.
For more on Michelle Gibson and further reading on this subject.
Q. Is Michelle Gibson’s theory that there was a sophisticated worldwide energy grid prior to this event correct? (she has it that, prior to this there was worldwide “unity consciousness” and a “sophisticated energy grid”).
Yes.
Q. When was this grid in operation?
From 150 years prior to the event.
Q. Is Michelle Gibson’s theory that worldwide “unity consciousness” was operating prior to the event correct?
No.
Q. Was there another event around AD 1,000, also destructive?
No.
Q. Is the scarcity of gravestones prior to the late-1600s linked to the 1700 event?
Yes.
Q. Was this population reduction engineered?
No.
Q. Was this reduction made to happen?
Yes.
Q. Was mudflood part of this scenario?
Yes.
Q. Was the destruction caused by the Dark Forces around 1700 intentional?
No.
Q. Was it a side effect of their takeover?
Yes.
Q. Did we have a natural defence against the Dark Forces’ realm that was destroyed (in approximately 1700)?
Yes.
Q. Was the mudflood actually a mudflood as we understand the term?
No.
Q. Was it simply a flood?
Yes.
Q. Was it triggered by an energetic disruption of the Earth as a means of taking control?
No.
Q. Do any of these words correspond to the method that caused the 1700 event: HAARP; CERN; portal; gateway; energy weapon?
No.
Q. Was partial destruction/penetration of the ice wall the cause of the flood circa 1700?
No.
Q. Was the partial destruction/penetration of the firmament the cause of the flood circa 1700?
No.
Q. Did the breaching of the ice wall and the firmament cause the 1700 event?
Yes.
However, rather than destruction of either/both causing a flood (directly), the breach triggered environmental catastrophe (which involved the flood).
This may seem like splitting hairs, but my assumption in the preceding two questions was of constituent parts of the ice wall/firmament making up the flood.
Q. Was there breaching of both the ice wall and the firmament?
Yes.
Q. Were there regions unaffected by the “mudflood”?
No.
Q. Are stories of great deluges (eg Noah’s Ark, the destruction of Atlantis) related to the “mudflood”?
Yes.
Q. Had Dark Forces previously visited Earth (prior to the 1700 event)?
Yes.
Q. Did they present themselves as gods on this occasion?
No.
Q. Were they greeted as gods on this occasion?
No.
Q. Did the Dark Forces previously attempt to hijack the Earth when they visited prior to 1700?
Yes.
Q. Did they succeed on any occasion(s)?
No.
As we shall see at in a subsequent post, their failure to “hijack” the Earth might be viewed in relative terms, as they evidently succeeded in gaining an influence.
Q. Was this failure due to the natural defence(s) against them?
Yes.
As ever, various further questions and lines of inquiry arise from these answers. In particular, the logistics/nature of how the Dark Forces (Anunnaki) were previously able to visit the Earth yet unable to take over/hijack it. Some of this may be down to defining terms, but also about perceiving the precise set of circumstances.
